<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Open Source Apps Always Better?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freelancefolder.com/are-open-source-apps-always-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freelancefolder.com/are-open-source-apps-always-better/</link>
	<description>The Blog For Freelancers And Web-Workers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:04:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 15 Amazing iPad Apps &#124; World&#39;s Greatest T-Shirt</title>
		<link>http://freelancefolder.com/are-open-source-apps-always-better/comment-page-2/#comment-62141</link>
		<dc:creator>15 Amazing iPad Apps &#124; World&#39;s Greatest T-Shirt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 07:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancefolder.com/?p=7824#comment-62141</guid>
		<description>[...] Are Open Source Apps Always Better? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Are Open Source Apps Always Better? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ten Terrific Apps to Help You Keep Track of Your Time &#8211; FreelanceFolder &#171; Tech4buziness &#8211; Eng</title>
		<link>http://freelancefolder.com/are-open-source-apps-always-better/comment-page-2/#comment-43374</link>
		<dc:creator>Ten Terrific Apps to Help You Keep Track of Your Time &#8211; FreelanceFolder &#171; Tech4buziness &#8211; Eng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 05:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancefolder.com/?p=7824#comment-43374</guid>
		<description>[...] Rachota Timetracker–This is simple time tracking tool that can be used on many different platforms. It will run on Linux or on a Mac. It also supports many different languages, so if English is not your first language you may be able to find a version for you. Version 2.0 is also open source software. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rachota Timetracker–This is simple time tracking tool that can be used on many different platforms. It will run on Linux or on a Mac. It also supports many different languages, so if English is not your first language you may be able to find a version for you. Version 2.0 is also open source software. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are Open Source Apps Always Better? &#171; TRUtricks</title>
		<link>http://freelancefolder.com/are-open-source-apps-always-better/comment-page-2/#comment-42994</link>
		<dc:creator>Are Open Source Apps Always Better? &#171; TRUtricks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 15:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancefolder.com/?p=7824#comment-42994</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: &#8220;Are Open Source Apps Always Better?&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: &#8220;Are Open Source Apps Always Better?&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dene</title>
		<link>http://freelancefolder.com/are-open-source-apps-always-better/comment-page-2/#comment-40596</link>
		<dc:creator>Dene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancefolder.com/?p=7824#comment-40596</guid>
		<description>&quot;Exceptions to that rule (as far as UI is concerned at least) can be applications built using a programming language like java for example.&quot;
I meant to say &quot;Examples&quot; there, rather ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Exceptions to that rule (as far as UI is concerned at least) can be applications built using a programming language like java for example.&#8221;<br />
I meant to say &#8220;Examples&#8221; there, rather &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dene</title>
		<link>http://freelancefolder.com/are-open-source-apps-always-better/comment-page-2/#comment-40595</link>
		<dc:creator>Dene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancefolder.com/?p=7824#comment-40595</guid>
		<description>&quot;Little or no support&quot;
Yes and no ... that&#039;s mostly down to the community, although some open source projects do offer premium support, so you can argue there&#039;s really not much difference in some cases.

&quot;Ugly interface&quot;
I agree that there are some real ugly ones out there. Although this can be down to the OS environment you use ... most open source software I know of has been designed to run on Linux or some *NIX equivalent, so it might not integrate into windows or mac so well. Exceptions to that rule (as far as UI is concerned at least) can be applications built using a programming language like java for example.

&quot;Terrible file structures or code&quot;
It does happen. Using tools to reformat code can be a minor inconvenience.

&quot;Lack of updates  and bugs&quot;
Yes. Long established apps with a big community doesn&#039;t suffer from this problem so much though and are often updated faster then then a lot of commercial equivalents.

@iphotoshoppr
Blender is one of the industry standard open source 3D design applications. Asking if GIMP can do 3D design is like asking if a screwdriver can be used as a hacksaw. Also, GIMP&#039;s support for printing (or lack of) is more a legal issue, although there are work arounds ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Little or no support&#8221;<br />
Yes and no &#8230; that&#8217;s mostly down to the community, although some open source projects do offer premium support, so you can argue there&#8217;s really not much difference in some cases.</p>
<p>&#8220;Ugly interface&#8221;<br />
I agree that there are some real ugly ones out there. Although this can be down to the OS environment you use &#8230; most open source software I know of has been designed to run on Linux or some *NIX equivalent, so it might not integrate into windows or mac so well. Exceptions to that rule (as far as UI is concerned at least) can be applications built using a programming language like java for example.</p>
<p>&#8220;Terrible file structures or code&#8221;<br />
It does happen. Using tools to reformat code can be a minor inconvenience.</p>
<p>&#8220;Lack of updates  and bugs&#8221;<br />
Yes. Long established apps with a big community doesn&#8217;t suffer from this problem so much though and are often updated faster then then a lot of commercial equivalents.</p>
<p>@iphotoshoppr<br />
Blender is one of the industry standard open source 3D design applications. Asking if GIMP can do 3D design is like asking if a screwdriver can be used as a hacksaw. Also, GIMP&#8217;s support for printing (or lack of) is more a legal issue, although there are work arounds ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iphotoshoppr</title>
		<link>http://freelancefolder.com/are-open-source-apps-always-better/comment-page-2/#comment-40047</link>
		<dc:creator>iphotoshoppr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancefolder.com/?p=7824#comment-40047</guid>
		<description>I do use open-source apps as well as commercials ones.

Though there are a lot of open-source apps that meet everyone&#039;s needs (e.g. Chrome, Filezilla, Thunderbird, Firefox, Pidgin), there are some that can&#039;t be used by designers and illustrators: inkspace and GIMP. Inkspace is slow if  it has a certain number of layers. Use Xara instead (not free, but not expensive). Xara has features Inkspace doesn&#039;t. Illustrator is much more powerful than Xara and is an ultimate tool for any kind of creative people. GIMP can&#039;t be used for print at all. It doesn&#039;t have support for 3D, does it? Something similar to VersionCue? Pen tablets support? Open-source community that develops GIMP has to invest a lot of time/money to create a commercial-like software that does its job as well as Photoshop does. If they did, they won&#039;t give it for free :) GIMP is still for an occasional use but not for serious projects.

Linux can be great for developers but I wonder how you guys, check sites you develop in IE 6-8 if you run Linux on your machines? Do you use Virtualbox or any similar app? Do you use a legal copy of Windows/MacOS to run inside it? Do you use some online services like browsershots? There are a couple of free apps for Windows like ietester/multipleIE you can use but Windows still ain&#039;t free. Linux is great for servers and web development but you can&#039;t live without Windows and it can&#039;t be completely replaced while 80% of people use it.

MS office is still better though it gets slower with every release and bloated with features a normal user won&#039;t ever need. But I&#039;m sure some people need them. OpenOffice is just slow. OO Writer can&#039;t format text/lists normally. OO Calc has problems with a floating point calculations. There&#039;s no need to pay $400 for MS office if you need Word/Excel. Get them for $100. Or replace them with Google/Zoho if you&#039;re an occasional user and spend a lot of time online.

My point is that only simple commercial apps can be replaced with open-source ones (which are a way better in most cases).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do use open-source apps as well as commercials ones.</p>
<p>Though there are a lot of open-source apps that meet everyone&#8217;s needs (e.g. Chrome, Filezilla, Thunderbird, Firefox, Pidgin), there are some that can&#8217;t be used by designers and illustrators: inkspace and GIMP. Inkspace is slow if  it has a certain number of layers. Use Xara instead (not free, but not expensive). Xara has features Inkspace doesn&#8217;t. Illustrator is much more powerful than Xara and is an ultimate tool for any kind of creative people. GIMP can&#8217;t be used for print at all. It doesn&#8217;t have support for 3D, does it? Something similar to VersionCue? Pen tablets support? Open-source community that develops GIMP has to invest a lot of time/money to create a commercial-like software that does its job as well as Photoshop does. If they did, they won&#8217;t give it for free :) GIMP is still for an occasional use but not for serious projects.</p>
<p>Linux can be great for developers but I wonder how you guys, check sites you develop in IE 6-8 if you run Linux on your machines? Do you use Virtualbox or any similar app? Do you use a legal copy of Windows/MacOS to run inside it? Do you use some online services like browsershots? There are a couple of free apps for Windows like ietester/multipleIE you can use but Windows still ain&#8217;t free. Linux is great for servers and web development but you can&#8217;t live without Windows and it can&#8217;t be completely replaced while 80% of people use it.</p>
<p>MS office is still better though it gets slower with every release and bloated with features a normal user won&#8217;t ever need. But I&#8217;m sure some people need them. OpenOffice is just slow. OO Writer can&#8217;t format text/lists normally. OO Calc has problems with a floating point calculations. There&#8217;s no need to pay $400 for MS office if you need Word/Excel. Get them for $100. Or replace them with Google/Zoho if you&#8217;re an occasional user and spend a lot of time online.</p>
<p>My point is that only simple commercial apps can be replaced with open-source ones (which are a way better in most cases).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heavysilver</title>
		<link>http://freelancefolder.com/are-open-source-apps-always-better/comment-page-2/#comment-40012</link>
		<dc:creator>heavysilver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancefolder.com/?p=7824#comment-40012</guid>
		<description>open sources apps have really poor support services :/ great article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>open sources apps have really poor support services :/ great article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AeM</title>
		<link>http://freelancefolder.com/are-open-source-apps-always-better/comment-page-2/#comment-39975</link>
		<dc:creator>AeM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancefolder.com/?p=7824#comment-39975</guid>
		<description>most of big open source players are not done freely...
examples :
apache : ibm+oracle+others
drupal : mostly companies
php : zend+yahoo (mostly)
python : think google
openoffice : ex-sun, ibm
and so on</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>most of big open source players are not done freely&#8230;<br />
examples :<br />
apache : ibm+oracle+others<br />
drupal : mostly companies<br />
php : zend+yahoo (mostly)<br />
python : think google<br />
openoffice : ex-sun, ibm<br />
and so on</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viet</title>
		<link>http://freelancefolder.com/are-open-source-apps-always-better/comment-page-2/#comment-39927</link>
		<dc:creator>Viet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancefolder.com/?p=7824#comment-39927</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that code structure of paid software is better. Many FOSS have been developed by top developers. Think PHP, Python, Perl languages, Ruby on Rails framework. Design of paid is often better, but when talking about code, this argument becomes false. Code of FOSS is often better because: Everyone can screen it. Therefore bugs and security holes get fixed much faster than closed source softwares. Reason is simple: Development is open and everyone can contribute their goodness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that code structure of paid software is better. Many FOSS have been developed by top developers. Think PHP, Python, Perl languages, Ruby on Rails framework. Design of paid is often better, but when talking about code, this argument becomes false. Code of FOSS is often better because: Everyone can screen it. Therefore bugs and security holes get fixed much faster than closed source softwares. Reason is simple: Development is open and everyone can contribute their goodness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Webb</title>
		<link>http://freelancefolder.com/are-open-source-apps-always-better/comment-page-2/#comment-39925</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancefolder.com/?p=7824#comment-39925</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting argument considering the vast range of open source and free software now available. There seems to be an alternative to nearly every paid application out there, but what the real advantages and disadvantages of free software are is still to be decided.

While I agree with many of the points made here by users, regarding the fact that open source has great community support, that you can find a solution to nearly anything on open source software and that it will constantly evolve, I still think paid apps have a fundamental advantage. 

With a paid app you do have a better structure, as designers have been paid to facilitate this side of the product, the code structure is better and more reliable, and there is usually a good customer support structure in place. I’d be interested to see what alternative apps people suggest in the user comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting argument considering the vast range of open source and free software now available. There seems to be an alternative to nearly every paid application out there, but what the real advantages and disadvantages of free software are is still to be decided.</p>
<p>While I agree with many of the points made here by users, regarding the fact that open source has great community support, that you can find a solution to nearly anything on open source software and that it will constantly evolve, I still think paid apps have a fundamental advantage. </p>
<p>With a paid app you do have a better structure, as designers have been paid to facilitate this side of the product, the code structure is better and more reliable, and there is usually a good customer support structure in place. I’d be interested to see what alternative apps people suggest in the user comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

