Comments on: Are Open Source Apps Always Better?

By: bathroomed beice benzophthalazine

bathroomed beice benzophthalazine — Sat, 19 May 2012 13:00:30 +0000

a successful director. considering the amount of…

“get rick quick with zero work” stories online, it is no surprise that more and more people are looking to put a piece of that money in their own pockets. if there are so many tales of making money online, how…

By: Are Open Source Apps Always Better? | FreelanceFolder | Online Study Zone

Sat, 14 Apr 2012 05:38:59 +0000

[...] the original: Are Open Source Apps Always Better? | FreelanceFolder [...]

By: Pop Free Dir Submitter

Pop Free Dir Submitter — Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:26:39 +0000

Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

By: retro cassette tape iphone case

retro cassette tape iphone case — Fri, 09 Mar 2012 03:27:24 +0000

Ive been meaning to study this and just by no means received a possibility. Its an problem that Im very considering, I just began studying and Im glad I did. Youre a great blogger, among the best that Ive noticed. This weblog unquestionably has some details and facts on subject that I just wasnt conscious of. Many thanks for bringing this points to light.

By: 15 Amazing iPad Apps | World's Greatest T-Shirt

15 Amazing iPad Apps | World's Greatest T-Shirt — Sat, 12 Mar 2011 07:01:49 +0000

[...] Are Open Source Apps Always Better? [...]

By: Ten Terrific Apps to Help You Keep Track of Your Time – FreelanceFolder « Tech4buziness – Eng

Mon, 10 May 2010 05:08:48 +0000

[...] Rachota Timetracker–This is simple time tracking tool that can be used on many different platforms. It will run on Linux or on a Mac. It also supports many different languages, so if English is not your first language you may be able to find a version for you. Version 2.0 is also open source software. [...]

By: Are Open Source Apps Always Better? « TRUtricks

Are Open Source Apps Always Better? « TRUtricks — Mon, 03 May 2010 15:00:35 +0000

[...] Source: “Are Open Source Apps Always Better?” [...]

By: Dene

Dene — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:06:36 +0000

“Exceptions to that rule (as far as UI is concerned at least) can be applications built using a programming language like java for example.”
I meant to say “Examples” there, rather …

By: Dene

Dene — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:04:23 +0000

“Little or no support”
Yes and no … that’s mostly down to the community, although some open source projects do offer premium support, so you can argue there’s really not much difference in some cases.

“Ugly interface”
I agree that there are some real ugly ones out there. Although this can be down to the OS environment you use … most open source software I know of has been designed to run on Linux or some *NIX equivalent, so it might not integrate into windows or mac so well. Exceptions to that rule (as far as UI is concerned at least) can be applications built using a programming language like java for example.

“Terrible file structures or code”
It does happen. Using tools to reformat code can be a minor inconvenience.

“Lack of updates and bugs”
Yes. Long established apps with a big community doesn’t suffer from this problem so much though and are often updated faster then then a lot of commercial equivalents.

@iphotoshoppr
Blender is one of the industry standard open source 3D design applications. Asking if GIMP can do 3D design is like asking if a screwdriver can be used as a hacksaw. Also, GIMP’s support for printing (or lack of) is more a legal issue, although there are work arounds ;)

By: iphotoshoppr

iphotoshoppr — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:55:23 +0000

I do use open-source apps as well as commercials ones.

Though there are a lot of open-source apps that meet everyone’s needs (e.g. Chrome, Filezilla, Thunderbird, Firefox, Pidgin), there are some that can’t be used by designers and illustrators: inkspace and GIMP. Inkspace is slow if it has a certain number of layers. Use Xara instead (not free, but not expensive). Xara has features Inkspace doesn’t. Illustrator is much more powerful than Xara and is an ultimate tool for any kind of creative people. GIMP can’t be used for print at all. It doesn’t have support for 3D, does it? Something similar to VersionCue? Pen tablets support? Open-source community that develops GIMP has to invest a lot of time/money to create a commercial-like software that does its job as well as Photoshop does. If they did, they won’t give it for free :) GIMP is still for an occasional use but not for serious projects.

Linux can be great for developers but I wonder how you guys, check sites you develop in IE 6-8 if you run Linux on your machines? Do you use Virtualbox or any similar app? Do you use a legal copy of Windows/MacOS to run inside it? Do you use some online services like browsershots? There are a couple of free apps for Windows like ietester/multipleIE you can use but Windows still ain’t free. Linux is great for servers and web development but you can’t live without Windows and it can’t be completely replaced while 80% of people use it.

MS office is still better though it gets slower with every release and bloated with features a normal user won’t ever need. But I’m sure some people need them. OpenOffice is just slow. OO Writer can’t format text/lists normally. OO Calc has problems with a floating point calculations. There’s no need to pay $400 for MS office if you need Word/Excel. Get them for $100. Or replace them with Google/Zoho if you’re an occasional user and spend a lot of time online.

My point is that only simple commercial apps can be replaced with open-source ones (which are a way better in most cases).