<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should You Use HTML In Your E-Mail?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freelancefolder.com/use-html-in-e-mail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freelancefolder.com/use-html-in-e-mail/</link>
	<description>The Blog For Freelancers And Web-Workers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:30:59 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Patterson</title>
		<link>http://freelancefolder.com/use-html-in-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-24395</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancefolder.com/?p=1616#comment-24395</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;So many e-mail programs block or manipulate the content of the e-mail if it is in html, has images, or other non-textual information. And, that is if it gets passed the spam filters — which almost all make HTML e-mails considered spammy&lt;/em&gt;

This certainly used to be true, but the facts today are that nearly all the major email clients send in HTML format by default now. Spam filters, if they really were considering all HTML emails spammy, would be totally overwhelmed.

That&#039;s not to see there are not many challenges in deliverability, just that the format itself does not doom you to spam filter purgatory.

Besides, who hasn&#039;t received a ton of plain text spam from Nigeria?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>So many e-mail programs block or manipulate the content of the e-mail if it is in html, has images, or other non-textual information. And, that is if it gets passed the spam filters — which almost all make HTML e-mails considered spammy</em></p>
<p>This certainly used to be true, but the facts today are that nearly all the major email clients send in HTML format by default now. Spam filters, if they really were considering all HTML emails spammy, would be totally overwhelmed.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to see there are not many challenges in deliverability, just that the format itself does not doom you to spam filter purgatory.</p>
<p>Besides, who hasn&#8217;t received a ton of plain text spam from Nigeria?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Kintis</title>
		<link>http://freelancefolder.com/use-html-in-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-24390</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Kintis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancefolder.com/?p=1616#comment-24390</guid>
		<description>HTML e-mails are only good when the recipient is &quot;fully&quot; accepting your transmission(s).  So many e-mail programs block or manipulate the content of the e-mail if it is in html, has images, or other non-textual information.  And, that is if it gets passed the spam filters -- which almost all make HTML e-mails considered spammy.

However, if your set of recipients -- and you are sure! -- have accepted and fully see your HTML e-mail, then go ahead.  In this scenario, you&#039;ll have much better reporting with regard to tracking your e-mail marketing campaigns, the &quot;opens&quot;, the click-throughs, and more.

Any other instance requires text-based e-mail transmission(s).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HTML e-mails are only good when the recipient is &#8220;fully&#8221; accepting your transmission(s).  So many e-mail programs block or manipulate the content of the e-mail if it is in html, has images, or other non-textual information.  And, that is if it gets passed the spam filters &#8212; which almost all make HTML e-mails considered spammy.</p>
<p>However, if your set of recipients &#8212; and you are sure! &#8212; have accepted and fully see your HTML e-mail, then go ahead.  In this scenario, you&#8217;ll have much better reporting with regard to tracking your e-mail marketing campaigns, the &#8220;opens&#8221;, the click-throughs, and more.</p>
<p>Any other instance requires text-based e-mail transmission(s).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Mogal</title>
		<link>http://freelancefolder.com/use-html-in-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-24228</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Mogal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 21:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancefolder.com/?p=1616#comment-24228</guid>
		<description>It really depends on the situation. If you are prospecting or &quot;cold-calling&quot; via email then it&#039;s better to keep it text-based. HTML is great and I&#039;m a big advocate for it but it&#039;s more effective when your reader has chosen to receive emails as HTML. If you&#039;re running a consistent email campaign (weekly or monthly) then HTML is a great way to keep your readers engaged and interested, but let your readers have the choice. 

I tend to prefer HTML emails but when I get them on my Blackberry, it&#039;s a pain to read them. I&#039;m starting to steer towards subscribing to receive text-based emails for that reason. Even with the text-based emails, if they include a link to the HTML version I would definitely check it out once I got on my laptop. 

People in the creative industries (web design, graphic design, even Internet marketing) tend to favor HTML emails. Unfortunately not everyone shares our preferences. I&#039;ve run campaigns for others who saw an increase in their unsubscribes because their contacts didn&#039;t want to receive HTML emails. 

It really depends on the situation and the contact list. I&#039;d say, if in doubt or if it&#039;s your first correspondence, stick to text-based and include the link for an HTML version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really depends on the situation. If you are prospecting or &#8220;cold-calling&#8221; via email then it&#8217;s better to keep it text-based. HTML is great and I&#8217;m a big advocate for it but it&#8217;s more effective when your reader has chosen to receive emails as HTML. If you&#8217;re running a consistent email campaign (weekly or monthly) then HTML is a great way to keep your readers engaged and interested, but let your readers have the choice. </p>
<p>I tend to prefer HTML emails but when I get them on my Blackberry, it&#8217;s a pain to read them. I&#8217;m starting to steer towards subscribing to receive text-based emails for that reason. Even with the text-based emails, if they include a link to the HTML version I would definitely check it out once I got on my laptop. </p>
<p>People in the creative industries (web design, graphic design, even Internet marketing) tend to favor HTML emails. Unfortunately not everyone shares our preferences. I&#8217;ve run campaigns for others who saw an increase in their unsubscribes because their contacts didn&#8217;t want to receive HTML emails. </p>
<p>It really depends on the situation and the contact list. I&#8217;d say, if in doubt or if it&#8217;s your first correspondence, stick to text-based and include the link for an HTML version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thewirds</title>
		<link>http://freelancefolder.com/use-html-in-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-24190</link>
		<dc:creator>Thewirds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancefolder.com/?p=1616#comment-24190</guid>
		<description>I never use HTML in my email since i can&#039;t preview it not unless you preview it in Forum that support for HTML view. But really using non HTML and HTML in your email does not makes no difference, cause what is the really matter is your point and not the images, link, bla bla bla, don ever do that, cause they will accusing you spamming their inbox with your HTML

Also just for a note here, most spam email use a lot of HTML so if you intended to use HTML, you better not use it often</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never use HTML in my email since i can&#8217;t preview it not unless you preview it in Forum that support for HTML view. But really using non HTML and HTML in your email does not makes no difference, cause what is the really matter is your point and not the images, link, bla bla bla, don ever do that, cause they will accusing you spamming their inbox with your HTML</p>
<p>Also just for a note here, most spam email use a lot of HTML so if you intended to use HTML, you better not use it often</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil the Freelance Writer</title>
		<link>http://freelancefolder.com/use-html-in-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-24184</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil the Freelance Writer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancefolder.com/?p=1616#comment-24184</guid>
		<description>The problem I have with receiving full-blown HTML emails, especially from people I don&#039;t know, is that Outlook blocks all the images automatically. I then usually can&#039;t be bothered to unblock the images and the email soon gets deleted.

As others have said some light HTML use, that won&#039;t ruin the look of your email if not displayed correctly, is probably the way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem I have with receiving full-blown HTML emails, especially from people I don&#8217;t know, is that Outlook blocks all the images automatically. I then usually can&#8217;t be bothered to unblock the images and the email soon gets deleted.</p>
<p>As others have said some light HTML use, that won&#8217;t ruin the look of your email if not displayed correctly, is probably the way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Business Info</title>
		<link>http://freelancefolder.com/use-html-in-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-24155</link>
		<dc:creator>Business Info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancefolder.com/?p=1616#comment-24155</guid>
		<description>Some great points. We sent our newsletters in both HTML and plain text format. If reader can&#039;t or won&#039;t want to use html, they still can read the plain version.

Thx
MoneyAside.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some great points. We sent our newsletters in both HTML and plain text format. If reader can&#8217;t or won&#8217;t want to use html, they still can read the plain version.</p>
<p>Thx<br />
MoneyAside.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://freelancefolder.com/use-html-in-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-24150</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancefolder.com/?p=1616#comment-24150</guid>
		<description>I always send HTML emails-- my signature is a GIF; I like including hyperlinks; I am prone to italicize now and then. And I prefer receiving HTML emails, too. When I&#039;m at my desk, that is. Those same emails are a real nuisance when I read them on my BlackBerry. I&#039;ve been thinking about this a lot lately...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always send HTML emails&#8211; my signature is a GIF; I like including hyperlinks; I am prone to italicize now and then. And I prefer receiving HTML emails, too. When I&#8217;m at my desk, that is. Those same emails are a real nuisance when I read them on my BlackBerry. I&#8217;ve been thinking about this a lot lately&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melek</title>
		<link>http://freelancefolder.com/use-html-in-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-24145</link>
		<dc:creator>Melek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancefolder.com/?p=1616#comment-24145</guid>
		<description>About 50% of the work I do for clients is creating/coding HTML based emails. In order to test it thoroughly in various email clients, I use Litmus.com. It&#039;s great at showing you exactly what works/doesn&#039;t work in each. Outlook 2007 is the bane of my existence as it doesn&#039;t want to do anything the same as other emails.

When you are in the design phase, just keep certain things in mind such as:

• Many email clients no longer recognize the P tag. Use BR or use DIVs if you need to center text
• Many don&#039;t recognize VSPACE. So, i use tables and set cell height. (Emails are one place where using tables is totally acceptable...so go crazy :))
• All your styles have to be inline. No external CSS style sheets
• Outlook wont display background images at all! Which can really mess up your design.
  So, if you need a bkgd color, use a color, not an image.
• DONT use one big image as your email. Many spam filters will catch that as spam
• ALWAYS use ALT tags to describe every image. Most email apps keep images off until the user manually clicks to have them downloaded. ALT tags are key to telling the user what each image is, hopefully inspiring him to open the email and click thru
• A lot of email software (what you use to execute the campaign) will allow you to create a text and html version, then sends the correct version to each user based on his selected preferences.

And aside from design thoughts:
• Keep the subject line short enough to read it all in the preview pane. And front-load your subject line so the most important words are first in case it gets cut off
• Make your from line recognizable. Don&#039;t have it coming from &quot;Suzie&quot;....have it come from your business name
• Be sure to review your stats from your email campaign (most email software has stats as part of what you pay for). Reviewing what people click can help you revamp the email for better results.

Ok, long enough comment! Thanks for the article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 50% of the work I do for clients is creating/coding HTML based emails. In order to test it thoroughly in various email clients, I use Litmus.com. It&#8217;s great at showing you exactly what works/doesn&#8217;t work in each. Outlook 2007 is the bane of my existence as it doesn&#8217;t want to do anything the same as other emails.</p>
<p>When you are in the design phase, just keep certain things in mind such as:</p>
<p>• Many email clients no longer recognize the P tag. Use BR or use DIVs if you need to center text<br />
• Many don&#8217;t recognize VSPACE. So, i use tables and set cell height. (Emails are one place where using tables is totally acceptable&#8230;so go crazy :))<br />
• All your styles have to be inline. No external CSS style sheets<br />
• Outlook wont display background images at all! Which can really mess up your design.<br />
  So, if you need a bkgd color, use a color, not an image.<br />
• DONT use one big image as your email. Many spam filters will catch that as spam<br />
• ALWAYS use ALT tags to describe every image. Most email apps keep images off until the user manually clicks to have them downloaded. ALT tags are key to telling the user what each image is, hopefully inspiring him to open the email and click thru<br />
• A lot of email software (what you use to execute the campaign) will allow you to create a text and html version, then sends the correct version to each user based on his selected preferences.</p>
<p>And aside from design thoughts:<br />
• Keep the subject line short enough to read it all in the preview pane. And front-load your subject line so the most important words are first in case it gets cut off<br />
• Make your from line recognizable. Don&#8217;t have it coming from &#8220;Suzie&#8221;&#8230;.have it come from your business name<br />
• Be sure to review your stats from your email campaign (most email software has stats as part of what you pay for). Reviewing what people click can help you revamp the email for better results.</p>
<p>Ok, long enough comment! Thanks for the article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meryl K. Evans</title>
		<link>http://freelancefolder.com/use-html-in-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-24144</link>
		<dc:creator>Meryl K. Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancefolder.com/?p=1616#comment-24144</guid>
		<description>If you can do it — offer a text version of the e-mail newsletter, or provide a link that takes the reader to the online version where HTML works fine in a Web browser. If you can only offer one e-mail formatting option, I recommend text. You can reach a wider base with text than one with HTML that doesn’t display right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can do it — offer a text version of the e-mail newsletter, or provide a link that takes the reader to the online version where HTML works fine in a Web browser. If you can only offer one e-mail formatting option, I recommend text. You can reach a wider base with text than one with HTML that doesn’t display right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Taylor</title>
		<link>http://freelancefolder.com/use-html-in-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-24138</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancefolder.com/?p=1616#comment-24138</guid>
		<description>The majority opinion here seems to be my own view as well. HTML for e-mail newsletters is fine. But I never include HTML in my e-mails. I do send out opt-in newsletters in both HTML and text formats and let readers decide which they prefer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The majority opinion here seems to be my own view as well. HTML for e-mail newsletters is fine. But I never include HTML in my e-mails. I do send out opt-in newsletters in both HTML and text formats and let readers decide which they prefer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/19 queries in 0.027 seconds using memcached

Served from: vps.smallfuel.com @ 2010-03-16 09:31:18 -->